-
In November 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning letter to the sponsor as a result of a BioResearch Monitoring Program (BIMO) inspection which observed objectionable conditions. The warning letter cited two violations of the Title 21 CFR.
-
In December 2024, following the release of the 2024 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) staff shared the FDA’s perspective on what their role was in the development of the 2024 DoH and how it may impact FDA procedures. The DoH is intended to guide clinical research involving human participants that is often used as the foundation for other guidelines such as the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP).
-
In October 2024, the World Medical Association (WMA) announced the adoption of the 2024 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH) during the 75th WMA General Assembly in Helsinki, Finland, the same location where the Declaration was initially adopted 60 years prior.
-
On September 27, 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning letter to an Institutional Review Board (IRB) as a result of a (BIMO) inspection from July of 2023. BIMO inspections evaluate compliance with of FDA regulatory requirements, in this case, title 21 CFR Parts 50, protection of human subject, and 56, Intuitional Review Boards.
-
On November 8, 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) hosted a virtual public webinar for clinical research stakeholders as well as anyone interested in the informed consent process of clinical trials titled “Informed Consent – More than Just Another Document to Sign?”. As the title suggests, the webinar explores the standards for informed consent in FDA regulated trials, how they are impacting the trial participant’s experience, and how they can be innovated and improved upon.
-
In this podcast “Optimizing Human Performance in Clinical Trials by Applying Gilbert’s Behavioral Engineer Model”, host Linda Sullivan of Metrics Champion Consortium (MCC) chats with Sandra “SAM” Sather of Clinical Pathways about how SAM uses performance improvement science to support clients in implementation of major changes in clinical trials, proactively and reactively. For example, HIPAA, risk management, and recently, remote monitoring during the pandemic.
-
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has a Good Clinical Practice (GCP) FAQ site which is updated on an ongoing basis. The EMA offers guidance in the form of questions and answers (Q&As) on GCP as approved by the GCP Inspectors Working Group.
-
Have you visited the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page? It is a valuable resource for sponsors and CROs participating in global trials in reference to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) in the context of the 28 countries of the European Union.
On this site, the EMA has published answers to the most frequently asked questions it has received and organized them into 11 categories.
-
During the current COVID-19 pandemic, it has become necessary for sponsors of clinical trials to rely on remote methods to access electronic health records and electronic source data. With risk-based monitoring becoming more common, and with sponsor/CRO monitors reviewing electronic source data remotely, many questions have arisen regarding what security measures need to be in place to ensure the protection of study participants’ data. Here is one such question.
-
As sponsor or CRO monitors are continuing to monitor clinical trial sites remotely for the foreseeable future, additional clarification is needed for how to proceed while protecting subject safety and data integrity. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released an updated COVID-19 clinical trial guidance with clarification on the requirements for the investigator to review IND safety reports. The question and answer guidance shows how we must be very careful to not decrease the safety protection checks and balances we have in GCP between stakeholders.
