Common Rule Changes and their Effects, as Proposed by the NPRM

8/12/2016

According to the Office for Human Research Protections, the Common Rule, which began circulating in 1991, is undergoing an upgrade of sorts in order to ensure the better protection of human subjects involved in research conducted through clinical trials. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has propositioned the revision of the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. The goal of the Common Rule’s revision would be to strengthen the overall policy through modernization and an increase and focus on efficiency.

Upcoming Course: Monitoring Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Frequently Asked Questions - Understanding the NEW May 2016 FDA Draft Guidance!

6/14/2016

Date: June 16, 2016

Time: 1:00pm-2:30pm, EDT US

Duration: 90 Minutes - Online

Course Link: http://www.lifesciencetraininginstitute.com/doc/monitoring-electronic-health-records-ehrs-0001

UPDATE: This course will include discussion of the NEW FDA Draft Guidance “Use of Electronic Health Record (EHR) data in Clinical Investigations”

Innovations in Electronic Consent: Reducing Regulatory Risk While Improving Participant Comprehension and Retention

6/13/2016

June 14th, 2016, TOMORROW
11:00 am EDT | 16:00 GMT

Key processes within our industry have been in need of substantial change and improvement, one being the informed consent process. 

Informed consent is still one of the most cited regulatory deficiencies, this along with the new technologies available will make electronic consent more and more commonplace. Facing this new reality, we must learn how this impacts each stakeholder. 

New Investigator Warning Letter posted MAR 2016

5/6/2016

An FDA warning letter issued by Director David Burrow, Pharm.D., J.D. of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to Benedict S. Liao, M.D. informs Dr. Benedict of the “objectionable conditions observed during” the course of an FDA inspection conducted at his clinical site between August 11 and September 29, 2015. This letter is a great example of the importance of having proper investigator training on research and the study protocol. Many of the findings outlined in the Form FDA 483 can be traced back to the investigator’s brazen disregard for the protocol and lack of understanding of the difference between standard of care and clinical research, as seen in his written response: